You can read the output before you run the trial.
One record, three audiences. Each report is here in full, with nothing behind a form — because the person who needs this usually has to convince four other people, and they cannot forward a description.
Figures are illustrative, model an organisation of 1,400 people, and reconcile with the Sprawl Simulator. No customer data appears in any of them, and no organisation described in them is real.
The Governance Report
For management and the audit committee. What is running and actually in use, how much is governed and owned, the attention points ranked by impact, the action items that follow from them, and the evidence and method behind every finding. Supports a defensible oversight position.
Read the full sample → SAMPLE 2 OF 3 · 3 PAGES · ON DEMANDThe Estate Report
For IT and security. The state of the estate with confidence bands, the findings that matter this week with a next action each, where confirmation is stuck, and coverage achieved against the sites you registered. Makes it workable.
Read the full sample → SAMPLE 3 OF 3 · 2 PAGES · ON DEMANDThe Contractual View
For legal, procurement and whoever owns contracts and DPAs. The compliance score with its formula, DPA completeness, vendor risk exposure, every recorded contract date soonest first, and the contract and agreement decisions due. Makes it signable.
Read the full sample →WHY THEY DIFFER
One record, read three ways.
The audit committee needs a defensible statement and does not want the inventory. IT needs the inventory and a queue. Legal and procurement need the contract and agreement position. The same underlying record produces all three, which is why the numbers in them cannot disagree — and why a question asked in one meeting can be answered from another.
Each report states its own method and its own limits. None of them claims to be complete, because the estate changes and a report that claimed completeness would be wrong the week after it was produced.